Jason Barton

Professional Information and Energy News

The success of genetically modified crops provides opportunities to win over their critics

without comments

Many years of activist friends decrying the evils of GM food has led to a knee-jerk reaction on my part, resisting these Frankenfoods. But then, a few more years of working with some of the scientists who perform these genetic modifications has made me wonder. When I ask these scientists, people who ride their bikes to work and drink organic, free-trade coffee out of their reusable mugs, what they think of these protesters, they are thoughtful, considerate, and often come back to a similar response: ‘I don’t think these people really understand what they’re protesting.’

To me, that’s part of the reason for the protests. If we don’t understand it, maybe we shouldn’t be growing and then eating it. But these scientists claim that they do understand, and that it’s mostly very safe, and has vast potential for societal benefits. And people have been performing hybridization on plants and animals, creating stronger plow horses and better tasting sweet corn, for thousands of years. Still, there’s something fishy about crossing a strain of corn with a squid (pun regrettably intended).

As usual, this article from the Economist provides some excellent food for thought (yeah, another one). They are also attentive to the issue of poorer farmers. Since GM seeds are both more expensive, and produce more lucrative yields, the general belief is that the market is trending away from participation of smaller producers, and more towards industrialization and monopolization by large agri-businesses.

This is also, of course, central to biofuels, as the ability to ferment diverse, five and six carbon sugars into ethanol and other usable forms of energy, unlike the very easy to ferment glucose found in corn kernels and sugarcane, will likely rely on genetic modification of crops such as switchgrass, miscanthus, and even algae.

Indeed, it is a fascinating time to be alive, if even the focus is not always uniformly positive.

Genetically modified food

Attack of the really quite likeable tomatoes

Feb 25th 2010 | From The Economist print edition

IN THE 14 years since the first genetically modified crops were planted commercially, their descendants, relatives and remixes have gone forth and multiplied like profitable, high-tech pondweed. A new report (see article) shows that 25 countries now grow GM crops, with the total area under cultivation now larger than Peru. Three-quarters of the farmland used to grow soya is now sown with a genetically modified variant, and the figures for cotton are not that far behind, thanks to its success in India. China recently gave the safety go-ahead to its first GM rice variety and a new GM maize that should make better pig feed. More and more plants are having their genomes sequenced: a full sequence for maize was published late last year, the soya genome in January. Techniques for altering genomes are moving ahead almost as fast as the genomes themselves are stacking up, and new crops with more than one added trait are coming to market.

Read the entire article here.

Written by Jason

February 25th, 2010 at 9:16 pm